spider_matt ([info]spider_matt) wrote,
@ 2009-04-13 21:45:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current music:Counting Crows - A Long December

How America Does Business
It's been a boring week. On Friday we had a hail and farewell barbecue. We hailed a new lieutenant in our department and said farewell to Tong, a linguist and a pretty cool guy. Goofy, but cool. Tong left on Sunday, so Saturday night I went out for a couple hours for a couple drinks with him and some other people.

Yeah, like I said, my life has been pretty boring this past week. I've mostly been working on training at work and homework for my international relations class at home.

So how many of you have read about the rescue of the captain that was taken hostage by Somalian pirates? "With Hostage in 'Imminent Danger,' Navy Seals Shoot Three Captors, Detain a Fourth." Obama did something right: he "had given standing orders Friday night for the Navy to take action to rescue Capt. Phillips if the danger escalated." I don't think we should have been trying to negotiate to begin with. I think the U.S. Navy should be utilized more for its original purpose. Our country's military is trying to do so much, involving ourselves in things we have no businesses being involved in, that we seem to have forgotten our own history:

The initial challenge to the rapid expansion of U.S. commerce, however, came not from London or Paris but from the corsairs of the Barbary coast. In the 1790s the Algerians again began to prey on U.S. commerce in the Mediterranean. Once again, Congress debated whether the nation ought to buy protection or establish a navy to safeguard shipping. In March 1794 Congress decided to respond with force and passed a naval act that called for the construction of a half-dozen frigates.


It's just so... American, isn't it? As a country, we've never been ones to shy away from a fight. Fighting for what we think is right is perhaps the most inspirational aspect of American history. There have certainly been times when we have fought when we shouldn't but we also have a strong history for fighting when we should. I find it kind of funny that the first U.S. merchant ship taken by pirates since the 19th century is taken back by the Americans using brute force against the pirates. That's how America does business! The Navy Seal snipers rescuing the captain is icing on the cake.

Piracy is an increasing problem and with it disrupting commerce and threatening lives as often as it is at present, I can't believe our navy hasn't done more to help. This is precisely the kind of thing our navy was created for. Now we're too busy playing international politics. Obama could do a lot for his reputation if he takes an aggressive stance against piracy. I hate his economic policies but at least he had enough sense to authorize force against the pirates to rescue the captain. Granted, he tried negotiating first and that only encourages them. Hopefully this comes as a blow to their egos. Next time, let's try a little harder. If there's anything worth using our navy for, it's this. I would gladly go out on a ship to fight piracy. It's certainly a more worthwhile pursuit than anything I'm doing at present.



(6 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]kill_buddha
2009-04-13 02:03 pm UTC (link)
I like the idea of you fighting pirates too. It stirs up a great image :D

I thought it was pretty neat to see the SEALs being utilized for their primary purpose; absolute elimination of the threat.

(Reply to this)


[info]melissatse
2009-04-14 08:03 am UTC (link)
I wrote a piracy affirmative for the agriculture topic, but never got to run it because my partner felt sugar plantations in the Everglades as an affirmative was "edgier"

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]spider_matt
2009-04-14 08:28 am UTC (link)
You wanted to debate for the piracy of agriculture?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]melissatse
2009-04-14 08:43 am UTC (link)
No, I wrote an affirmative about why US subsidy policy for fisheries complicates international piracy, allowing them to overexploit endangered (but profitable) marine species. We ended up writing a sugar subsidy affirmative instead, which actually was a better argument because the literature was stellar on why US sugar subsidies are problematic

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]spider_matt
2009-04-14 11:51 am UTC (link)
You were saying that subsidies enabled pirates or helped them?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]melissatse
2009-04-14 07:21 pm UTC (link)
Subsidies sometimes are abused for piracy. Oftentimes there is a lack of transparency between government payments to the recipients and those funds are funneled into illegal fishing activities, including the exploitation of the Patagonian toothfish, which is an endangered species. Here's a quote from Oceana:

"Despite international consensus that the world’s oceans are in trouble, a handful of countries continue to provide massive subsidies to their commercial fishing industries. These subsidies are a primary driver of global overfishing and other destructive fishing practices, including illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, also referred to as “pirate fishing.”

Pirate fishing is a serious global problem and one of the main impediments to the achievement of sustainable world fisheries. Worth between $4 billion and $9 billion per year, pirate fishing represents a major loss of revenue, particularly to some of the poorest countries in the world where dependency on fisheries for food, livelihoods and revenues is high.1 Pirate fishing respects neither national boundaries nor international attempts to manage high seas resources. Pirate fishing puts unsustainable pressure on fish stocks, marine wildlife and habitats, subverts labor standards and distorts markets."

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(6 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…